Suspected bandits ambushed and killed three farmers from the Koro ethnic group on Monday morning in Nasarawa State, heightening fears over escalating insecurity in rural areas.
The attack occurred around 8 a.m. along a route to Atukpo community in Doma Local Government Area, as the victims traveled to deliver a message on behalf of their father. Eyewitnesses and relatives identified the deceased as Tailor Gayu—widely known as “Reverend Father”—Zacharia Wudu, and James Delle Iwala, all married men with families.
One relative, speaking on condition of anonymity during a telephone interview, recounted how the group was set upon by the gunmen shortly after leaving home. “They set out early, full of life, only to be cut down in such a senseless way,” the relative said, urging authorities to bolster security patrols along vulnerable rural paths.
Mr. Nathaniel Ajeh, another family member, decried the incident as “unfortunate, sad, and barbaric,” emphasizing the toll on farming communities reliant on safe access to fields and settlements. “The government must act decisively to curb this rising tide of violence before it spirals out of control,” Ajeh told Daily Independent. “Our people deserve to go about their daily lives without fear.”
Efforts to obtain an official response from the Nasarawa State Police Command proved unsuccessful, with repeated calls to the Public Relations Officer going unanswered at the time of reporting. Local leaders have called for immediate investigations and enhanced community policing to prevent further tragedies amid a surge in banditry across the North-Central region.
Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Minister Nyesom Wike has ordered an immediate stop to unauthorized development on a disputed Abuja property, accusing a former Chief of Naval Staff of deploying military personnel to intimidate government officials and seize the land.
Wike made the declaration during an on-site inspection Monday, following reports that armed soldiers had expelled FCT Administration (FCTA) enforcement teams attempting to enforce development control regulations.
“No individual, regardless of past rank or influence, will be permitted to undermine lawful authority or flout urban planning statutes,” Wike stated. “The Departments of Land and Development Control are mandated to curb illegal construction and land grabbing. Any encroachment lacking valid documentation—regional planning approval or lawful title—will not be tolerated.”
FCTA officials had initially visited the site to implement the minister’s directive but were forcibly removed by soldiers allegedly acting on the retired officer’s instructions. Wike, upon receiving a second alert of military occupation, personally intervened to assess the situation.
“It is regrettable that a former senior military officer would resort to coercion rather than due process,” he said. “When challenged to produce title deeds or building permits, none were presented. This sets a dangerous precedent: if the powerful can bypass the law, what recourse remains for ordinary citizens?”
The minister confirmed he had engaged the Chief of Defence Staff and Chief of Naval Staff, both of whom pledged to address the matter. “We seek no confrontation, only compliance with the rule of law,” Wike emphasized. “Enforcement will proceed uniformly, irrespective of the perpetrator’s status.”
Reaffirming his administration’s zero-tolerance policy on land infractions, Wike warned that the FCTA would reclaim all illegally occupied government property, regardless of the influence behind the encroachment.
A 29-year-old woman in Enugu State has been charged with criminal defamation and misleading police after baselessly accusing her husband of sexually assaulting their two young daughters, an allegation that unraveled under medical scrutiny and stemmed from marital discord.
Chisom Okonkwo appeared before a Magistrate Court in Enugu on Tuesday, facing two counts under Charge No. CnI…A/2025, according to court documents obtained by the News Agency of Nigeria (NAN). The charges allege that in August 2024, at Adoration Junction in Emene, Okonkwo publicly defamed her husband, Ozioma Okonkwo, by claiming he had defiled their daughters—aged five and three—exposing him to “hatred, contempt, and ridicule” among community members and authorities.
Enugu State Police Command spokesperson, DSP Daniel Nwoye, confirmed the arraignment in a statement, noting that Ozioma was initially arrested and detained based on his wife’s complaint. “Following a thorough investigation, including medical examinations of the children, no evidence of defilement was found,” Nwoye said. “The results confirmed the girls had not been harmed by their father, contrary to the claims.”
Investigators determined the accusation arose from “domestic misunderstandings” between the couple, a finding echoed in similar cases where personal grievances have led to fabricated reports of child abuse. Okonkwo is also accused of deceiving law enforcement by providing false information, an offense punishable under Nigeria’s Criminal Code Act.
The case highlights the perils of weaponizing serious allegations in family disputes, potentially eroding trust in genuine victims of sexual violence. In Nigeria, where child defilement carries a minimum 14-year sentence under the Violence Against Persons (Prohibition) Act, false claims can devastate reputations and clog judicial resources. Okonkwo’s lawyer, who entered a not guilty plea on her behalf, argued the matter was a “private family issue” exaggerated by emotions, but the magistrate remanded her in custody pending bail considerations.
No trial date has been set, but the prosecution has vowed to pursue the maximum penalty—up to two years imprisonment for defamation—to deter similar misuse of the legal system. Ozioma, now exonerated, has not commented publicly, but family sources described him as “relieved yet scarred” by the ordeal.
As the case unfolds, advocates like the Enugu State chapter of the Nigerian Bar Association’s Family Law Committee have called for mandatory counseling in domestic disputes to prevent escalation. “False accusations not only harm the accused but undermine efforts to protect real victims,” said committee chair, Barrister Ifeoma Eze.
The incident serves as a stark reminder amid Nigeria’s ongoing battle against gender-based violence, where over 11,000 rape cases were reported in 2024 alone, per National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons (NAPTIP) data. For the Okonkwo family, what began as household tensions has now become a public reckoning with the law.
In a fresh blow to Nigeria’s main opposition party, the Federal High Court in Abuja has issued an interim order barring the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) from proceeding with its long-awaited national convention, scheduled for November 15 and 16 in Ibadan, Oyo State.
Justice Peter Lifu delivered the ruling Tuesday morning, granting an ex-parte application by former Jigawa State Governor Sule Lamido, who alleges the party unlawfully denied him access to the national chairmanship nomination form.123 The court also restrained the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from monitoring, supervising, or recognizing any outcomes from the event, pending resolution of Lamido’s substantive suit, marked FHC/ABJ/CS/2299/2025.06
“This application is meritorious and succeeds,” Justice Lifu declared, emphasizing that allowing the convention to proceed would cause “irreparable harm” to Lamido, a founding PDP member and two-term governor from 1999 to 2007.14 He cited the party’s alleged failure to publish a proper timetable or adhere to constitutional guidelines for aspirant participation, echoing a similar injunction issued by Justice James Omotosho on October 31, which had temporarily stalled the gathering.310
Lamido, represented by Senior Advocate of Nigeria Jephthah Njikonye, argued in his October 28 motion that the PDP’s actions violate the party’s constitution and internal democracy principles, effectively excluding him from a contest he claims to be “eminently qualified” for.214 He seeks a mandatory injunction compelling the issuance of the form and halting the convention until due process is followed.
On October 31, Justice Lifu initially declined the interim relief but ordered the PDP and INEC to show cause within 72 hours, adjourning to November 6.71213 Both defendants filed counter-affidavits on November 6, insisting Lamido missed the nomination window and that the process complied with party rules.8 The court stood down proceedings until 1 p.m. Tuesday for the substantive hearing.
The PDP, which has been without a substantive national chairman since Iyorchia Ayu’s suspension in March 2023, had hoped the Ibadan convention would install new leadership amid internal fractures and ahead of the 2027 elections.05 The event, themed around unity and renewal, was set to draw thousands of delegates and resolve lingering disputes from the 2023 polls.
Reactions poured in swiftly on social media, with X users decrying the PDP as a “dead walking party” plagued by “double wahala” from endless litigation.152023 One post lamented the treatment of Lamido, a party stalwart: “It is unfair to treat Baba Sule Lamido like this despite his loyalty and sacrifices. Haba.”15 News outlets like TVC and Channels Television amplified the ruling, warning of further delays to the opposition’s reorganization.176
Political analysts view the case as symptomatic of deeper PDP woes, including zoning controversies and factional rivalries that have fueled over a dozen lawsuits since August.34 “The balance of convenience favors Lamido; democracy demands inclusivity,” Justice Lifu noted, underscoring the court’s role in enforcing party constitutions.1
As the afternoon hearing looms, PDP spokespersons remained tight-lipped, but sources indicate the party may appeal or seek consolidation with parallel suits. For Lamido, the order buys time in a high-stakes tussle that could reshape Nigeria’s opposition landscape—or deepen its divisions.
Cristiano Ronaldo has declared that the 2026 FIFA World Cup will be his last, bringing the curtain down on one of football’s most storied international careers.
The 40-year-old Al Nassr striker made the announcement via video link at a Saudi investment forum on Tuesday, confirming speculation that had intensified since his cryptic “soon” retirement remark last week.
“Definitely, yes,” Ronaldo said when asked if the 2026 tournament—co-hosted by the United States, Canada, and Mexico—would mark his final World Cup appearance. “I’m gonna be 41 years old and I think it will be the moment.”
He further clarified his timeline for hanging up his boots: “Let’s be honest, when I mean soon, it’s probably one or two years I’ll still be at the game.”
With over 950 career goals and a record 133 for Portugal, Ronaldo is chasing a sixth World Cup appearance and a first-ever title. His closest brush with glory came in 2006, when a youthful Portugal side fell 1–0 to France in the semifinals.
Portugal are on the cusp of qualification for 2026. A win or draw against Ireland in Lisbon on Thursday will seal their place, with Ronaldo expected to lead the line.
Since joining Al Nassr in January 2023 on a deal reportedly worth over €200 million annually, Ronaldo has been central to Saudi Arabia’s football revolution. His arrival sparked a wave of high-profile signings—Neymar, Karim Benzema, and Sadio Mané among them—as the kingdom leverages sport to diversify its economy under Vision 2030.
That ambition reached a global pinnacle last December when Saudi Arabia was confirmed as the sole bidder and subsequent host of the 2034 World Cup.
Ronaldo, who won the Ballon d’Or five times between 2008 and 2017, remains prolific in the Saudi Pro League. He scored his latest goal—a penalty in Al Nassr’s 3–1 win over Al Orobah on November 1—taking his tally to 909 official career strikes.
As the countdown to 2026 begins, the football world braces for the final chapter of a career defined by records, resilience, and relentless ambition.
Suspected Boko Haram fighters launched a brazen late-night raid on a remote Christian village in Nigeria’s restive northeast, torching a church and wounding two residents before being driven back by troops, local sources said Monday.41
The assault on Pemi village in Chibok Local Government Area of Borno State—infamous as the site of the 2014 mass abduction of 276 schoolgirls—unfolded around 10:30 p.m. on Saturday, November 8, according to counterinsurgency expert Zagazola Makama and a local resident.12 No fatalities were reported, a small mercy in a region scarred by the jihadist group’s decade-long insurgency.
Zariyi Yusuf, a Pemi resident, posted photos on X showing the charred remains of the Evangelical Church Winning All (EYN) building, alongside smoldering homes, shops, and vehicles.2 “This is Chibok, yesterday (on November 8). Boko Haram took down a Church and it’s not even making news. Glory to God, no lives were lost,” Yusuf wrote, capturing the community’s mix of relief and frustration.4
Makama, a respected analyst on Lake Chad Basin security, detailed how the gunmen—suspected Boko Haram operatives—fired sporadically into the village before troops from Operation Hadin Kai, Nigeria’s multinational counterterrorism force, intervened alongside the Civilian Joint Task Force (CJTF) and other agencies.1 The clash forced the attackers to retreat, but not before Mallam Bukar, 30, sustained a gunshot wound to his left leg and Yama Sumai, 40, was shot in his right hand.
The victims were airlifted to General Hospital Yola in neighboring Adamawa State, where medical staff confirmed they are “responding well” to treatment, Makama added in his X post, which garnered hundreds of engagements.10
This incident marks yet another blow to Chibok, a predominantly Christian enclave that has endured repeated Boko Haram incursions since the group’s infamous April 2014 kidnapping, which thrust the conflict into global headlines. Over 90 of those girls remain unaccounted for, and the area has seen a surge in attacks this year, including a May assault that killed 14 and razed homes.23 Borno Governor Babagana Zulum condemned similar strikes in May, blaming both Boko Haram and its splinter, the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP), for compromising military outposts and terrorizing civilians.2122
The raid comes at a precarious moment for Nigeria-U.S. relations, just days after President Donald Trump designated Nigeria a “Country of Particular Concern” for alleged religious freedom abuses, citing thousands of Christian deaths attributed to Islamist militants.4 Trump’s October 31 statement referenced Open Doors data showing Nigeria accounting for over 70% of global faith-based Christian killings in 2024—more than 3,100 victims—and warned of aid cuts or even military action if the violence persists.4
Presidential aide Daniel Bwala responded on November 10 by expressing optimism for an imminent Tinubu-Trump summit to “clarify misunderstandings” and highlight shared anti-terrorism goals, including U.S. arms sales that have bolstered Nigeria’s fight against Boko Haram.4 Yet, with insurgents like Boko Haram—whose name translates to “Western education is forbidden”—escalating tactics in 2025, including drone strikes and alliances with bandits, experts warn the group’s grip on Borno remains firm.1317
Local voices, including a November 9 X post from a Chibok resident pleading for “immediate security intervention,” underscore the human toll: fear, displacement, and a plea to #EndTerrorNow.3 As the Nigerian military claims successes in repelling attacks, the cycle of violence in the northeast—responsible for over 35,000 deaths since 2009—persists, testing both domestic resolve and international partnerships.
The Theatre Command of Operation Hadin Kai has not issued an official statement on the Pemi raid as of Monday afternoon, but sources indicate heightened patrols in Chibok to prevent reprisals. For residents like Yusuf, the burned-out church stands as a stark reminder: in Chibok, survival is news enough.
The Nigerian presidency has reiterated its confidence that President Bola Tinubu will soon hold face-to-face talks with U.S. President Donald Trump, despite escalating tensions over Washington’s designation of Nigeria as a “Country of Particular Concern” (CPC) for alleged severe violations of religious freedom.
Speaking on Arise Television’s Prime Time on Monday, Daniel Bwala, Special Adviser to President Tinubu on Media and Policy Communication, said the anticipated bilateral engagement could take place “either at the White House or the State House” and may occur “at any time.”
“In diplomacy, protocol is key,” Bwala stressed. “When you’re building something, it must be preserved and protected. We will not be pressured into revealing the stage we are at in this discussion because there must be respect for protocol.”
His remarks follow a series of high-profile statements from the Trump administration, including an October 31 Truth Social post in which the U.S. leader accused Nigeria of allowing “thousands of Christians” to be killed by “radical Islamists,” citing data from Open Doors estimating over 3,100 faith-based Christian deaths in Nigeria in 2024 alone.
Trump subsequently threatened to halt all U.S. aid and warned of potential military intervention, stating: “If the Nigerian Government continues to allow the killing of Christians, the U.S.A. will immediately stop all aid… and may very well go into that now disgraced country, ‘guns-a-blazing,’ to completely wipe out the Islamic Terrorists.”
In response, President Tinubu issued a statement on November 1 rejecting the characterization of Nigeria as religiously intolerant, emphasizing constitutional guarantees of freedom of worship and inviting U.S. collaboration in combating extremism.
Bwala, in a November 1 statement, highlighted alignment between the two leaders on counterterrorism, noting that the Trump administration had previously authorized significant arms sales to Nigeria—support that the Tinubu government has “adequately utilized” to achieve “massive results” against Boko Haram and the Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP).
“Both President @officialABAT and President @realDonaldTrump have shared interest in the fight against insurgency and all forms of terrorism against humanity,” Bwala wrote.
He added that any “perceived differences” regarding the nature of terrorist threats in Nigeria would be clarified during the upcoming leaders’ meeting.
While no official date has been confirmed, unverified reports circulating on social media earlier this month suggested a planned Tinubu visit to Washington in early November—possibly to meet U.S. Vice President JD Vance—may have been postponed, with some claiming Trump demanded Nigeria first address its internal security challenges. The presidency has neither confirmed nor denied these reports.
Analysts say the stakes are high: U.S. aid to Nigeria exceeds $500 million annually, primarily in health, agriculture, and security assistance. A CPC designation could trigger sanctions, including visa restrictions and funding cuts, under the International Religious Freedom Act.
Meanwhile, domestic reactions remain mixed. The Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) has urged calm, while some civil society groups have criticized the government’s handling of insecurity in the Middle Belt and northern regions, where clashes between herders and farmers—often framed in ethno-religious terms—continue to claim lives.
As diplomatic channels remain active behind closed doors, the anticipated Tinubu-Trump summit is seen as a critical opportunity to de-escalate rhetoric, reaffirm security cooperation, and address mutual concerns over religious freedom and violent extremism.
The presidency has signaled that such high-level engagement will proceed with discretion, prioritizing substance over spectacle in a relationship vital to both nations’ strategic interests in West Africa.
London — November 11, 2025 — U.S. President Donald Trump has escalated a transatlantic media firestorm by demanding the BBC retract a documentary and apologize for allegedly defamatory editing of his January 6, 2021, speech—or face a $1 billion lawsuit in U.S. courts. The threat, delivered in a legal letter dated November 9, comes just days after two top BBC executives resigned amid accusations of institutional bias, prompting an unprecedented apology from the broadcaster’s chairman and reigniting debates over its future as a publicly funded entity.
The controversy centers on a 2024 episode of the BBC’s flagship investigative series Panorama, titled “Trump’s America: The Road to January 6.” The program spliced clips from Trump’s Ellipse rally speech, creating the impression he directly urged supporters to “fight like hell” and march immediately to the Capitol—phrasing that, in context, was separated by nearly an hour and included calls for peaceful protest. Critics, including a leaked internal memo from former BBC standards adviser Michael Prescott, labeled the edit “misleading” and part of a pattern of “systemic bias.” 10
BBC Chairman Samir Shah addressed the uproar in a letter to UK lawmakers on Monday, conceding the edit “did give the impression of a direct call for violent action” and describing it as “an error of judgment.” He vowed reforms to bolster editorial oversight at the corporation, which has weathered financial strains, including hundreds of job cuts in recent years, while relying on a mandatory TV licence fee from British households. 11 Shah’s statement followed the dramatic resignations on Sunday of Director General Tim Davie and BBC News CEO Deborah Turness, both of whom cited personal accountability for the lapse.
Davie, who had led the BBC since 2020, told staff his departure was “entirely my decision,” emphasizing that “as director general, I have to take ultimate responsibility” for editorial missteps. 13 Turness, a veteran journalist previously at NBC News, echoed the sentiment, stating the scandal had “reached a stage where it is causing damage to the BBC—an institution that I love.” 16 Their exits, confirmed by BBC insiders, mark a seismic shift at the 100-year-old broadcaster, which has faced serial scrutiny—from a 2004 scandal over Iraq War reporting to earlier 2025 rebukes for a Gaza documentary ruled “materially misleading” by regulators and for airing unvetted anti-Israel remarks at Glastonbury. 18
Trump’s Ultimatum: Retraction or Retribution
Trump’s legal team, led by attorney Alejandro Brito, fired off the cease-and-desist letter to BBC headquarters in London, accusing the network of “false and defamatory” content designed to “interfere in the presidential election” by portraying Trump as inciting the Capitol riot. 0 The demands include:
An immediate on-air and online retraction of the Panorama episode;
A public apology acknowledging the “malicious, disparaging” edits;
“Appropriate compensation” for reputational harm.
Failure to comply by November 14 at 5 p.m. EST (10 p.m. GMT) would trigger a lawsuit seeking no less than $1 billion in damages, potentially filed in Florida where the program was accessible online. 3 Trump, no stranger to media litigation—he recently sued The New York Times for $15 billion over unrelated coverage—hailed the resignations on social media as proof the BBC was “caught doctoring” his “perfect” speech, branding its journalists “corrupt” and “dishonest.” 5 White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt amplified the attack, dubbing the BBC “100-per-cent fake news.” 17
The threat has sparked a whirlwind on X (formerly Twitter), with users from Trump supporters to UK conservatives amplifying calls for accountability. One post declared it “the END for the BBC,” garnering hundreds of interactions, while others urged jail time for those involved, tying the scandal to taxpayer-funded licence fees. 24 27 Broader sentiment reflects polarized views: right-leaning accounts celebrate it as a “reckoning,” while defenders decry it as foreign meddling in British media. 2
UK Backlash: From Jubilation to Warnings
The saga has cleaved Britain’s political landscape. Former Conservative Prime Minister Boris Johnson, a longtime BBC critic, vowed to withhold his licence fee until the issue was resolved and demanded Davie’s head. 17 Current Tory leader Kemi Badenoch hailed the resignations as justice for a “catalogue of serious failures,” while ex-BBC journalist Karen Fowler-Watt warned of a “right-wing attack” in a polarized media ecosystem. 13
Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey fired back at Trump, imploring Prime Minister Keir Starmer to “keep his hands off” the BBC, which he called “the world’s number one news source.” Starmer’s office struck a measured tone, affirming the BBC’s “vital role in an age of disinformation” but insisting it must “correct mistakes quickly” to preserve trust. 15
Public opinion on London’s streets mirrors the divide. Construction worker Jimmy (who declined his surname) told AFP the BBC’s reputation is “tarnished” and its impartiality in doubt, while 78-year-old writer Jennifer Kavanagh sighed that it’s “always attacked from the right and from the left—they can never get it right.”
A Charter in the Crosshairs
Timing couldn’t be more fraught: The UK government is poised to launch a review of the BBC’s royal charter, which governs its operations and funding until 2027. 4 Amid stretched budgets and over 500 viewer complaints since last week’s Daily Telegraph exposé, the scandal has supercharged calls to reform or scrap the licence fee, which generates £3.7 billion annually but faces evasion rates above 10%. 11 Analysts like Fowler-Watt describe the BBC as in “a situation of crisis,” with Trump’s intervention risking perceptions of undue U.S. influence on sovereign media.
Legal experts question the lawsuit’s viability: Defamation claims across borders hinge on proving “actual malice” under U.S. standards, and the BBC’s apology may blunt damages. 3 Yet for Trump, the move aligns with a broader offensive against perceived adversaries, from CNN to CBS.
As the November 14 deadline looms, the BBC must navigate retraction risks that could embolden critics while staving off a financial juggernaut. Shah hinted at a measured response to the “litigious fellow,” but with Trump’s shadow looming over Broadcasting House, the stakes for impartiality—and survival—are higher than ever.
Maiduguri, Borno State — November 11, 2025 — Troops from Operation HADIN KAI (OPHK), the Joint Task Force North East, achieved a significant victory against Boko Haram and Islamic State West Africa Province (ISWAP) insurgents on Sunday, rescuing 86 kidnapped civilians and dismantling a terrorist camp in Borno State.
The operation unfolded when soldiers from the 135 Special Forces Battalion, operating under Sector 2 of OPHK, intercepted a group of terrorists along the Buratai–Kamuya Road near Dutse Kura. Intelligence indicated the insurgents were in the midst of abducting civilians and commandeering vehicles. In a swift response, the troops engaged the attackers, preventing further abductions and forcing the terrorists into a disorganized retreat toward the village of Mangari.
A subsequent pursuit led to a decisive clash near the insurgents’ makeshift camp, where the troops overwhelmed the fighters, compelling them to flee. Clearance operations in the area uncovered 11 rudimentary structures used by the terrorists, which were promptly destroyed. Among those freed were men, women, and children, many of whom had been held captive for an undetermined period.
“We are grateful to the Nigerian military for this timely intervention,” said one of the rescued civilians, speaking anonymously due to ongoing security concerns. “These terrorists have terrorized our communities for too long; this gives us hope.”
In the firefight and subsequent searches, the troops recovered an arsenal of weapons and logistics support, including:
One AK-47 rifle loaded with five magazines containing 73 rounds of ammunition;
Four PKT ammunition belts;
Five civilian vehicles, five motorcycles, eight bicycles, and two logistics tricycles hijacked by the insurgents.
No casualties were reported among the Nigerian forces, underscoring the effectiveness of their training and tactics in the volatile North East region.
Parallel Strike on Terrorist Supply Lines
In a coordinated effort, troops stationed at Mangada apprehended 29 suspected terrorist logistics suppliers traveling toward Chilaria. The arrests disrupted a major resupply convoy, yielding a haul of critical materials:
Two pickup vans and one tricycle laden with Premium Motor Spirit (PMS);
Approximately 1,000 liters of petrol in jerricans;
Four gallons of engine oil;
Two new tires for gun-mounted trucks;
A substantial cache of medical consumables, foodstuffs, and other provisions.
These seizures represent a blow to the insurgents’ operational sustainability, as logistics remain a key vulnerability for groups like Boko Haram and ISWAP amid Nigeria’s protracted counter-insurgency campaign.
The Military High Command praised the troops for their “gallantry and professionalism,” urging Operation HADIN KAI to maintain relentless pressure on terrorist networks across the North East. “Sustain these operations to deny the enemy freedom of action,” the command stated in an official release. “Every success like this erodes their capacity and restores security to our people.”
This latest triumph comes amid heightened military activity in Borno, where insurgent attacks have persisted despite years of federal and multinational efforts. Rights groups, however, continue to call for parallel investments in community rehabilitation and economic development to address the root causes of radicalization in the region.
As Nigeria marks another step forward in its fight against extremism, analysts warn that sustained vigilance is essential to prevent the insurgents from regrouping. Operation HADIN KAI, launched in 2015, has claimed numerous victories, but the shadow of Boko Haram—responsible for tens of thousands of deaths and displacements since 2009—looms large.
