Sunday, April 21, 2024
HomenewsWhy Otedola Can't Be Charged With Fuel Subsidy Bribery — Lawyer

Why Otedola Can’t Be Charged With Fuel Subsidy Bribery — Lawyer

Yemi Akinseye-George (SAN), a law professor, believes it is impossible for the federal government to accuse Femi Otedola, an oil magnate, with bribery in the case of Hon Farouk Lawan, who was sentenced to seven years in prison on Tuesday.

Lawan, the former head of the House of Representatives ad-hoc Committee investigating gasoline subsidy, was found guilty of accepting a bribe from Otedola in exchange for his company, Zenon Oil and Gas Limited, being removed from the list of companies under investigation.

Lawan is now being held in Kuje Prison in Abuja, Nigeria’s capital.

But Akinseye-George said he (Otedola) does not have a “guilty intent”.

“The giver does not have what in law we call ‘guilty intent’. He knew he was not supposed to give a bribe and then informed the law enforcement agency to make them part of the process; so, he doesn’t have the guilty intent and without this intent, the law does not punish,” he said.

He explained that for an offence of bribery to be committed, there must be two elements which are the mental and physical elements.

“The mental element of the offence is the state of the mind of the giver at the time he gave. In this case, you don’t have the corrupt mental element.

“All you have is the physical element, which was with the knowledge of law enforcement agents.

“That is why in this case, you cannot talk about punishing the giver because the state of mind of the giver was not to corrupt but to expose corruption,” he added.

In his testimony before the court in June 2019 said the money he handed over to Lawan was given to him by the DSS.

He added that the alleged bribe money was given to Lawan in a sting operation.

He said that the DSS, however, did not catch Lawan red-handed at the time of collecting the money from him (Otedola), as shown in a video played in the open court.

He also told the court that he did not have any documentary evidence to the fact that the money was given to him by the DSS, saying that the money was given to him in bits.

He further stated that he did not take down the serial numbers of the money given to him by the DSS, adding that he did not sign any document when collecting the money in bits.

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

Recent Comments